Athletes not overpaid free essay sample

In a world with numerous and various types of occupations, it is often difficult to measure the importance of each profession monetarily. Each person, society and organization has a different perspective on the significance of certain occupations but it seems that cross-culturally there is a common belief that professional athletes are extremely overpaid. Professional athletes worldwide are often questioned regarding their controversially large amount of pay. Taking into consideration the amount of workload and pressure most professional athletes deal with, it can be justified that they deserve the amount of money they make, showing that they are not overpaid. Firstly, consumers are willing to pay the athletes large amounts of money and also, they do not use taxpayer’s money. Professional athletes earn an appropriate amount of money in regards to their occupation and this should not come under criticism by the public. Consumers are willing to pay billions and billions of dollars (repetition) yearly to show their passion and dedication towards their favorite sports teams. We will write a custom essay sample on Athletes not overpaid or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page Many people pay for overpriced tickets and merchandise just to support their team, and will, however complain about the huge paychecks the athlete’s cash in at the end of the day. As long as consumers continue paying that much money for merchandise (alliteration) and games, the teams will continue making a lot of money and consequently the players will make even more. As a fan of the Chicago Bulls, a multi-million dollar franchise, I have spent a Dhatt 2 lot of money on my favorite player’s jerseys, shoes, posters and game tickets. A lot more money than I’d like to admit. The professional athletes are not to blame. Consumers continue to spend money like water (simile) and then proceed to accuse the athletes of having huge lump sums of cash. We as consumers have gladly given up our money to show our support towards a specific team. The consumers are more than willing to pay for overpriced merchandise; therefore the professional athletes are entitled to the money. (Paragraph: narration). The most common issue the public has is the large earnings of professional athletes. There is always great controversy over how much athletes are paid. People say doctors, nurses, teachers and police officers should be paid more as they benefit society. If that is the case, people should be prepared to pay higher taxes as we do pay for their wages. The money athletes make is a whole other ball game (metaphor), as we do not fund their games as taxpayers, the multi million-dollar corporations and big CEO’s do and they do not seem to have a problem with paying their athletes millions of dollars every season. So why should we? (Rhetorical question). The reality is, if LeBron James took a huge cut in his paycheck, no nurse or doctor or public service man would benefit. The same people do not pay them. The government and taxpayers do not fund professional athletes. The money spent on the teams is the owner’s money with which they can do whatever they would like. Members of the public should not criticize the professional athletes, as they do not use taxpayer money to pay their own bills. (Paragraph: Cause and Effect). Dhatt 3 Professional athletes earn an appropriate amount of money in regards to their occupation and this should not come under criticism by the public. Consumers gladly pay a lot of money to support their favorite teams. Also, people should not be concerned with the paychecks of professional athlete’s, as taxpayer money is not used to fund them. Athletes are not overpaid. One has to consider the constant pressure and hard work they put in to be the best. From a young age many people aspire to become athletes, as the passion drives them rather than the money. Money is not relevant therefore they should not be criticized for it.

Phrasal Verbs with Stand

Phrasal Verbs with Stand Phrasal Verbs with Stand Phrasal Verbs with Stand By Maeve Maddox The comment of a new U.S. resident telling about how he obtained residency got me thinking about the difficulties that ESL learners must have with phrasal verbs built on stand: A Vincentian priest at the parish stood in for me as a witness when I became a resident. With the help of several people in the church I got my work permit and became a citizen.† The grammar is unexceptionable, but the expression â€Å"stood in for me† conveys an unintended meaning. The new resident means that the priest â€Å"sponsored† or â€Å"testified for† him, but the idiom â€Å"to stand in for† means â€Å"to take the place of someone†: Paul Walkers brothers stand in for actor’s final scenes for Fast Furious 7 movie Cyril Ramaphosa to stand in for Zuma at briefing To convey the sense of sponsorship or testimony, one would say, â€Å"stand for witness,† â€Å"stand as witness,† or â€Å"stand up for†: At their hurried marriage, only a little boy stood for witness. I stand as witness for a sixteen-year-old boy I never met. My sister stood up for me at my wedding. â€Å"Stand up† can also mean, â€Å"fail to keep an appointment†: Her date stood her up at the last minute. A person â€Å"stands for† office. Countries and people â€Å"stand by,† â€Å"stand with,† or â€Å"stand up for† their friends: US says it will stand by allies against China The state of South Carolina is now offering drivers licenses that read: South Carolina Stands with Israel Students Stand Up for Football Coach Banned From Praying With Team As a verb, â€Å"stand by† means â€Å"to wait in readiness.† The noun stand-by means â€Å"a state of readiness: Police asked to stand by in case of trouble. Canteens on Stand-By to Respond to Tropical Storm Debby Egypt celebrates anniversary as army remains on stand-by Emergency services on standby to treat fans in Manaus â€Å"Stand by† also means, â€Å"to look on without intervening†: Pakistani Woman Beaten To Death By Her Family As Police Stand By We simply cannot afford to stand by while drugs, crime, corruption and terrorism devastate this already vulnerable region. As an imperative, â€Å"Stand by† means â€Å"wait for further developments†: Were Experiencing Technical Difficulties Please Stand By Many of these phrasal verbs are used with a literal meaning that is clear from the context: Stand aside so I can stay on the sidewalk. Stand up when the Queen enters the room. Stand back so the water doesn’t hit you. Here are a few more phrasal verbs built on stand: stand on: maintain â€Å"I stand on my decision.† stand aside/stand back: get out of the way If you can’t do the job as manager, stand aside/back and let me do it. stand for: represent, tolerate Superman stands for truth, justice, and the American Way. The boss won’t stand for repeated tardiness. stand out: be noticeable Wear something plain so you won’t stand out. stand up to: defend against, challenge, refuse to submit Next time George tries to take your lunch money, stand up to him. stand between: present a barrier His mother claims she doesn’t want to stand between them, but every time they set a date, she gets sick. stand down: leave the witness box; relax; withdraw. The witness was told to stand down. Police ordered to stand down as city burned. stand off: keep at distance The patrol stood off the enemy for three hours. Phrasal verbs represent only a small number of idioms that employ the word stand. A great many additional stand expressions remain to be discussed in another post. Want to improve your English in five minutes a day? Get a subscription and start receiving our writing tips and exercises daily! Keep learning! Browse the Expressions category, check our popular posts, or choose a related post below:50 Idioms About TalkingPeople versus Persons150 Foreign Expressions to Inspire You

Warehouse Operations Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Warehouse Operations - Term Paper Example The volume of goods to be transported and stored, the required mode of through put, the validity of the location as a transit point, the availability of area, the location for breaking bulk are some aspects that should be considered before setting up the warehouse. The selection of the location for the warehouse should be followed by the planning and designing of the warehouse on terms of space and design. The consideration of space layout , convenient storage space for different types of items, storage requirements, duration of inventorying, security of the goods, parking facilities for the transportation vehicles like fleets of trucks etc. should be done in the warehousing planning and designing process (Gunasekarana, Patel and McGaugheyc, 2004). The availability of handling equipment, loading trucks, access to labor resources and condition of the site are to be considered in the design of the warehouse as well. Workforce management is critical in the establishment and continuity of operations in a warehouse. A motivated, optimistic, well trained, skilled and enthusiastic workforce in then supply chain is indispensable for achieving competitive and strategic advantage for a logistics and supply chain business like Strategic Warehouse Management Inc. (SWM). A warehousing organization is a part of the macro supply chain and logistics management of companies functioning at a global scale. This involves the storage and movement of huge volumes of products. The products are not capable of moving by themselves. It takes a well-trained and efficient employee base in the organization so that the competitive logistics and warehousing operations are carried out in an efficient manner. The employees in the warehouse should be trained properly and specific steps should be taken by the organization to ensure that each of the employees understand his job well and

Article Critique of Moscow to insist Russia and China join chemical Research Paper

Article Critique of Moscow to insist Russia and China join chemical arms probe by Reuters & AP - Research Paper Example With this in mind, the two warring factions do not want to take responsibility and are therefore blaming one another for the misfortune that one of them caused and led to great damage to the country. The conflict in Syria, which is between rebels and the government has raged on for two years and has caused the deaths of over 70,000 people in the course of its life, that is still going on. The correctness rages on in that the rebels are attempting to take over power from the current government, where the war is beyond taking power for either group. Putting this into perspective means that the group that wins shall not be held accountable for the loss of lives and even the destruction of property that has been experienced countrywide, as well as the civil unrest. The loser will solely be responsible, whereby it is upon the loser to admit defeat and accept all that has occurred with no option of redress or appeal. In addition, the article addressing the Syrian conflict brings into persp ective the problem of a conflict that is too late to stop as all parties have too much to lose considering that, the government has put its all in the war against the rebels, while the rebels to have done the same. In addition, the rebels are backed by a good section of the civilian population, which means that the government is almost on the losing side due to the presence of civilians. In this case, civilians represent a good bargaining chip for the rebels, as the government is bound by international law not to engage civilians using the military or even by use of unnecessary or excessive force. Consequently, the outcome is that the government is losing, which makes the missile issue even more critical for them as a loss in the war is guaranteed for them to take political and legal responsibility for the war. It is at this point that the missile issue comes up again as it highlights an attempt to foil the attempts of one side of the conflict at clinching or maintaining power. This is evident and might appear biased towards the rebel side, as logical analysis would show the ability to fire missiles lies with the military. The same military backs the government, where the government is at war with rebels, and the whole situation does not look for the government, but the rebels (Reuters and AP). On the other hand, the missile could be part of intricate plan to oust the current government by forcing it to take responsibility for the said weapon. It is due to this that the international community in the form of the United Nations and the veto powers in it to look at the situation ad and determine the origin and the intent of its launch in relation to the Syrian conflict. The main concern of the international community, however, is not on the use of missiles against a civilian population but is instead focused on the use of chemicals in the missile. This is a major contravention of the laws of engagement in the event of war in an agreement that goes as far back as the 19th century, where there were signed treaties against the use of chemical warfare against the people, where even soldiers are included. Another perspective of this issue in the use of chemical warfare is what the international community stands to gain.

Article that illustrates supply and demand Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

That illustrates supply and demand - Article Example Additionally, apart from the global shift in the oil pricing, the US economy is rebounded from the eight months low profitability index in that period. Fluctuations in oil pricing have a prominent effect on the nation’s economic activities, which directly related to the economic growth. In this context, every respective activities of the nation are identified to be depended on the oil prices due to globalization and liberalization, which led to high reliance over the import and export operations. The changes in the prices of the oil will have transformed the real pricing of goods and/or services. Moreover, prices are one of the key variables in the economic term, which highly affects the demand along with supply of the same. In this regard, it can be stated that the major determinant of the oil prices includes the demand as well as supply and the market sentiment. Moreover, different nations are also identified to have high contribution towards oil consumption, which correspon dingly affects the pricing policies. While, assessment of the article it can be recognized that rise in the oil price will decelerates economic growth of the US in much higher extent. The country is not much dependent to the import of oils because of the dependence of other countries on the goods as well as services offered by the US have developed better competitive advantage globally. The article significantly notified that with the fall in oil pricing in the global market, the US and global benchmarked oil pricing has been narrowed down. Moreover, relatively cheap oil pricing in the US have encouraged various refineries to process more crude at a higher rates and with this significant reason the demand of the US crude oil has raised apart from the variation in the global oil prices (Friedman,

HS2: Arguments For and Against the High-Speed Rail Lines

HS2: Arguments For and Against the High-Speed Rail Lines Georgiana Raluca Andrei Introduction With the rapid growth of the economy and rapid expansion of technology, there is the need for a development of infrastructure. HS2 is a proposed infrastructure project to build a high speed rail line from London to Manchester and Leeds, via Birmingham, to begin operation in 2026 and be completed in 2032. It was supported by the Labour Government after 2009 and has had the support of the Conservative-Liberal Democrat Coalition Government since May 2010 (Butcher in Parliament, 2015). HS2 will be constructed in two separate phases: Phase 1 from London Euston to Birmingham Curzon Street and Lichfield with intermediate stations in West London (at old Oak Common) and at Birmingham Airport; Phase 2 from the West Midlands, splitting into two legs: an eastern leg to Leeds New Lane with intermediate stations in the East Midlands and South Yorkshire; and a western leg to Manchester with intermediate stations at Crewe and Manchester Airport. In total, the scheme is estimated to cost  £42.6 billion for the infrastructure, with a further  £7.5 billion for rolling stock. The information presented by Louise Butcher on (Parliament, 2015) offers a clear report about HS2 Phase 1 of the scheme. Supporters claim that construction of HS2 is urgently needed in order to deliver wider economic and regional benefits and to meet future demands. Opponents maintain that these demands are over stated and the same outcome can be achieved with other, cheaper means. Arguments for and against HS2 are based on competing ideas not only about what the country needs in terms of new or improved rail infrastructure, but about how (if needed at all) it should be delivered and what the benefits and costs are of the ideas put forward. The two sides fundamentally disagree with the other’s interpretation of the ‘facts and figures’ about the scheme. The case for The government believes that creating a high-speed rail line between London and North of England will produce numerous advantages to society. →Travel time One of the most important benefits is the time saving. It is expected that once the project finished, it will make a difference in the time spent travelling. For example, Leeds to Birmingham is slashed from 1 hour 58 minutes to just 57 minutes. The East Midlands hub at Toton is 19 minutes from Birmingham. Manchester to Birmingham more than halves from 88 to 41 minutes (BBC News Magazine, 2015). Also, it will improve productivity through savings to journey time. →Crowds Creating a high-speed rail line would provide less crowded trains and make the journey more comfortable. This will protect the economy growth and the quality of life , and although cheaper measures might be easier ( such as upgrading existing lines), that would provide a short-term fix and it’s not suitable for long-term. →Punctuality The government argue that the HS2 trains will â€Å"stick more reliably to their timetables than the average train.† ( BBC News, 2013). This is an important issue because the pasengers value being on time . →Boosting UK economy Creating the HS2 will provide various ways to boost the economy, offering the prospect of a sustainable growth and allowing prosperity to expand beyond south east England, rebalancing UK economy. It will generate  22,000 construction jobs in the next five years  and once the entire line is running  create 100,000 jobs (BBC News Magazine, 2015). It will improve the access to employment, will make relocation of business easier and will create opportunities for increased business, tourism and leasure activities. The wider economic benefits of a UK HSR network to wider West Midlands cities, towns and shire counties is expected to be  £5.3 billion over 60 years, while the London to Birmingham route alone is expected to boost Birminghams economy by  £1.23 billion, and towns and cities in surrounding counties by  £2.5 billion (GO-HS2, 2015) . →Good for the environment HS2 will reduce dependency on air and car travel, this way reducing CO2 emissions. High speed trains are powered by electricity, so their environmental performance will improve over time as more electricity comes from renewable sources. By reducing the time travel between cities in the north of England and Scotland, it will encourage people to switch from air to rail. The construction of HS2 requires less land than building a new motorway. Also, it has the potential to stimulate further the ongoing regeneration of Birmingham city centre and boost growth around Birmingham Airport and NEC. The case against →The final bill wrong investment? The expected cost of HS2 from London to Manchester and Leeds was originally  £33bn, in 2009 prices, but earlier this year, at the time of the High Speed Rail (Preparation) Bill debate, the cost leapt to  £50bn, in 2011 prices. This excludes such things as localised infrastructure to connect with HS2, foot bridges and farm bridges to cross it. In addition, this does not include the Heathrow Link or any provision for changes to the scheme (Stop HS2, 2015). There are cheaper alternatives that would have the same effect as HS2 and will not cost as much, would be ready earlier and be better balanced in meeting needs across the whole country. →Demolition of homes and damage to rural England The most affected area will be the north of London’s Euston station. More than half of the homes affected are in or around Camden. Across the entire line more than 600 homes will be bulldozed and another 340 homes will becut off from their wider neighbourhood. Homeowners will get the market value of their property, plus 10% and moving costs Infrastructure supporting the line will be built on 250 acres of green belt land ( BBC News Magazine, 2015). HS2 threatens 350 unique habitats, 67 irreplaceable ancient woods, 30 river corridors, 24 Sites of Special Scientific Interest plus hundreds of other sensitive areas (Stop HS2, 2015). About 60 properties on the proposed phase 1 route are likely to experience levels of noise which will qualify for noise insulation under the Noise Insulation Regulations. The number of properties that may experience a noticeable increase in noise on the phase 1 route has been reduced since consultation by a third from 4,700 to around 3,100 ( BBC News Ma gazine, 2015). →Increased carbon emissions Opponents claim that few high-speed train passengers will transfer from air so the carbon emissions will not be reduced. Also, HS2 proposes to run trains at high speed which will need more energy than the existing Eurostar London-Paris trains – pushing up electricity and carbon consumption. It will use three times more energy than a normal inter-city train (HS2 Action Alliance, 2015). →Illusion of creating new jobs It’s been argued that HS2 will not actually create that many new jobs, most of them being associated with existing jobs within retail activity that have simply moved from other areas towards the new station. Over 70% of the jobs will be created in London, making London the central city. →HS2 will not benefit the ordinary traveller Building such an expensive train line would mean an increase in the train tickets. HS2 will only serve toincrease the price of train faresas train companies have to redistribute the costs associated with running on a line such as this (YouGov, 2015) Conclusion The Government is proposing to provide the capacity desperately needed across the UK through a new High Speed Rail Network. The new route will link London to Birmingham, then on to Manchester and Leeds forming what is known as the Y-Network. Eventually HSR trains will run to Newcastle, Glasgow and Edinburgh. Construction of such an important project brings together people who support the cause and people who don’t. Both sides have important arguments to take into consideration when deciding which side to take. It remains a hotly contested public issue because particular individuals, groups and industries believe they benefit from HS2 while others consider that they lose out. Reference list Butcher , L. (2015) Railways: HS2 Phase 1 Commons Library Standard Note [online]. Available at http://www.parliament.uk/business/publications/research/briefing-papers/SN00316/railways-hs2-phase-1 ( accessed 1st of March 2015). BBC News Magazine (2013) HS2: 12 arguments for and against [online]. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-24159571 ( accessed 1st of March 2015 ). BBC News (2013) Quantifying the benefits of HS2 [online]. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-22551178 ( accessed 1st of March 2015). GO-HS2 (2015) GO HS2 High speed rail [online]. Available at http://www.go-hs2.com/BenefitsOfHS2/EconomicImprovements.aspx ( accessed 1st of March 2015). Stop HS2 (2015) Stop HS2 [online]. Available at http://stophs2.org/facts ( accessed 1st of March 2015). HS2 Action Alliance (2015) Environment carbon journeys [online]. Available at http://www.hs2actionalliance.org/case-against-hs2/environment/carbon-journeys/ ( accessed 1st of March 2015). YouGov (2015) For and against: High speed rail [ online]. Available at https://yougov.co.uk/news/2012/01/20/for-against-high-speed-rail/ ( accessed 1st of March 2015).

Offshore Drilling Essay -- Argumentative Persuasive Essays

Offshore Drilling What is it? Drilling for oil in the ocean is one of the greatest technological breakthroughs in recent decades, and many new techniques have been developed to profit from the abundance of oil underneath the ocean floor. While drilling for oil has been around for hundreds of years in one form or the another, the effective extraction of petroleum from beneath the sea floor did not surface until the last forty years. The search for oil often turns out to be unproductive, but this practice is vital for the economic future of many nations. In order for any drilling to take place, an offshore drilling rig must first be installed. These offshore platforms can be situated in water up to a several hundred meters in depth. But before any drilling takes place, an oil and gas "trap" must first be located in the ocean, and with the ocean floor being at such great depths, the visibility is often very poor. To locate potential traps, engineers use seismic surveying, and then analyze the data they receive to decide whether or not drilling in the area would have the chance of containing oil and/or gas. The engineers will not know whether their assumptions are true until they penetrate the trap with a drill bit. Due to the fact that the traps can sometimes be a great distance below the ocean, advanced computer technology is required to guide the drill bit to a fixed location. Installed above the drill bit is a navigation device, which sends back information to the controller, allowing them to locate the exact location that is presu med to have the oil and to measure and monitor the trap. Inside the drill pipe, there is a steerable motor that can be controlled to adjust the drill and the direction in which it is headed. ... ...ould be less tension between the federal government, the oil companies, environmentalists, and the public. More importantly, we would be following the process theology and respecting nature, which is what God wants us to do. References Offshore Drilling Page. 1999. Gulf Coast Environmental Defense. <http://www.southerncitizen.org/gced/articles/no_rigs/10_15_97dp.html> <http://www.southerncitizen.org/gced/articles/no_rigs/battle.html> Offshore Drilling. Odyssey Magazine n ° 1. <http://www.elf.fr/odyssee/us/mag/mag01/fmer.htm> Offshore Drilling. Australian Institute of Petroleum. <http://www.aip.com.au/education/projects/pt_offshore/> Bright, Thomas J., Thompson, Jack H. Research Product. 21 Jan. 1980. 24 Jan. 1980 <http://www.epa.gov/ged/publica/c1410.htm> Barbour, Ian. Ethics in an Age of Technology. New York: HarperCollins, 1991.